In the fire service there is a saying. The fire service is 200 years of tradition unimpeded by progress.
While not really true it can, at times, feel like it is. There seems to be some in the EMS world that are trying to follow that tradition.
Recently an article was written for the Contra Costa Times that covered a pilot program in Alameda County. Some of the paramedics from two departments within the county (Hayward and Alameda City) are receiving extra training. They, along with medics from a total of 12 projects throughout the state, are going to be able to not take patients to the hospital. Instead they will have the latitude to take the patient to an urgent care or other health clinic. This would potentially save the patient an expensive ambulance ride to the hospital and would (again potentially) free up the emergency department to treat someone that is actually seriously ill.
The program also includes post clinic visits by the paramedics for some limited patient follow up. The goal is to prevent the need for another 911 call. Prevention is better than a cure.
There has been some serious opposition to this pilot project. I'll start with the opposition in the paper...The nurses union. The nurses union is screaming that paramedics aren't capable of doing something like this. That we lack the training/knowledge.
Tricia Hunter, executive director of American
Nurses Association/California said, "They're still not licensed
registered nurses, not licensed physicians, not licensed mental health
She's absolutely right. Paramedics are not RN's or MD's. We are however licensed paramedics. Paramedics can do most (if not all) of the commonly accepted nursing skills in CA (starting IV's, assessments, medications administration...) plus medics can do some things that RN's can't like pleural decompression. For a list of what paramedics can do in CA click here and scroll down to scope of practice. Oh, and did I mention that paramedics are trained to do these things generally under standing medical orders (meaning we diagnose which patients need what treatment and do the treatment without consulting anyone) and to do them in the field? Anyone can start an IV in a well lit Emergency Room. Try it on a freeway, in a wrecked car that's upside down, in the rain and at night.
So let us not go down the road of paramedics not having the training.
Really the nurses union is worried about losing jobs. Paramedics taking their patients to other care facilities and medics going out and trying to prevent the need for emergency health care in the first place (by visiting patients in their homes) could lessen the need for nurses. I get it. That's the role of a union. Save jobs. But I don't agree with that, if it means we can't even look into the possibility of a better method of health care delivery .
Vicki Bermudez of the California
Nurses Association said, "We think the money is better spent on existing services we know work."
Really? You think our current model of health care works? Long wait times in Emergency Departments. Outrageous costs. Everyone seems to blame health insurance companies but they're not the ones charging $5 for two pills of Tylenol. Clearly you haven't been a patient in a while. Anyone with some common sense can reasonably deduce that our current health care delivery model isn't working. Let's try to fix the system. I'm not saying this is the solution but it may be part of one. Let's try it and find out.
And obviously the guys with the medical license (the MDs....you know...the guys and gals that medics and nurses work for) think this idea has merit. So get with the program.
Enough with me ragging on the nurses union.
Now I'll move on to other complaints I've come across from people that have read this article. I'm going to generalize these somewhat.
There is the complaint about a cousin/brother/father/grandmother that was treated incorrectly on a call one time ergo medics can't do this. All these stories are anecdotal. To the people that use these arguments I have two points. First, you weren't there and you probably don't have all the facts. It's quite possible what the medic did was correct. Second, hypothetically speaking, if you were there AND had all the facts, that doesn't preclude the possibility or even the likelihood that the medic that treated your family member/friend/significant other was probably an idiot. They are out there in every profession. You may have just been unlucky and got one.
Then there are people that claim medics can't do this because of liability issues. Now remember, I'm talking about CA and not anywhere else. I don't know the laws in the other states. Here (and I assume almost everywhere else) medics work under the medical license of a doctor. As long as paramedics follow proper protocols they are covered.
The CA Health and Safety Code Section 1799.104 (b) states "No EMT-II or mobile intensive care paramedic rendering care
within the scope of his duties who, in good faith and in a
nonnegligent manner, follows the instructions of a physician or nurse
shall be liable for any civil damages as a result of following such
Section 1799.106 (a) goes further and states, "In addition to the provisions of Section 1799.104 of
this code, Section 2727.5 of the Business and Professions Code, and
Section 1714.2 of the Civil Code, and in order to encourage the
provision of emergency medical services by firefighters, police
officers or other law enforcement officers, EMT-I, EMT-II, EMT-P, or
registered nurses, a firefighter, police officer or other law
enforcement officer, EMT-I, EMT-II, EMT-P, or registered nurse who
renders emergency medical services at the scene of an emergency or
during an emergency air or ground ambulance transport shall only be
liable in civil damages for acts or omissions performed in a grossly
negligent manner or acts or omissions not performed in good faith. A
public agency employing such a firefighter, police officer or other
law enforcement officer, EMT-I, EMT-II, EMT-P, or registered nurse
shall not be liable for civil damages if the firefighter, police
officer or other law enforcement officer, EMT-I, EMT-II, EMT-P, or
registered nurse is not liable."
As long as medics aren't negligent I think we're ok.
Next there are those out there that think paramagics don't have the ability to figure out where a patient should go.
Are you kidding me? Paramedics make destination decisions all the time. where I work we have to decide between the closest hospital, trauma centers, stroke centers, burn centers, and cardiac centers all while keeping in mind patient condition, traffic, helicopter flight time and helipad at the hospital, and patient requests. In other counties in which I've worked we had to decided weather a kid needed to go to an emergency department approved for pediatrics, a pediatric medical center or a pediatric trauma center....and that was just for the kids. I don't think that adding one or two more possible places to drop off our patients is going to be very taxing.
Another thing detractors say is that the medics in their area are too busy to do follow up visits. News flash. Paramedics in almost every urban area are busy. But if we take the time to do a little preventative maintenance on our frequent flyers maybe, just maybe, they will call 911 a little less often. Which in turn will me the medics will be a little less busy. Also I'd much rather do a follow up visit at 2 in the afternoon versus responding to a 911 call to the same person at 2 in the morning. That's the same as saying that fire departments are too busy to work on fire prevention. Do you have any idea how many lives have been saved by smoke alarms/detectors, better fire codes when in building construction, sprinkler systems and the like? I bet it's not a small number. Again, prevention is better than a cure.
And the safety net (my phrase not theirs) that the nurses union says we are operating without (I know I said I was done picking on them. I'm not)....that's why we have cell phones. My medical director, a doctor, is just a call away. When in doubt, call for further direction. And if we're not sure weather a patient should be going to an ER or Urgent Care....take them to the ER.
Now I understand that this is a pilot program. When we try it things may not work out the way they are supposed to. But the current system is broken. We need to do something. Why not this?